Read Aloud the Text Content

This audio was created by Woord's Text to Speech service by content creators from all around the world.

Text Content or SSML code:

To exercise thinking differently, get rid of that sensible voice. In this way, your brain is free to get into the area of creativity and innovation. You can discover here what you can do instead of what you believe you should do. After you've completed creating opportunities, it can be taken back by you to your sensible self to judge your thoughts. Provided that your brain goes back to ancient or pedestrian opinions, get them out of the carton. Question yourself what answer you will come up with in the globe of science fiction. This is not as silly as you might consider. In its initial days, Neal Stephenson who was a science fiction author was hired by aerospace manufacturer Blue Origin to assist to imagine paths to go into space without using a rocket. Although Stephenson may not be a rocket specialist, what stimulated innovative designs was his creativity. Chapter 5 - Thanks to asking the correct questions, you obtain the most appropriate results. Ozan Varol got very bad messages from NASA in 1999. The three-legged falling system he thought to apply to use landing a rover on Mars was unsuccessful grippingly on a different duty. The action was taken quickly by Varol. The problem in his brain was: How do we rectify the present system? However, the person who apprehended things distinctively was engineer Mark Adler. He investigated the question: How can we challenge gravity for the traveler to arrive at Mars carefully? To respond to this question, it was rejected the three-legged system totally by Adler. Rather, it was created by him with a massive airbag system that would swell around the traveler and allow it to jump several dozen before standing on the Martian ground. Finally, what delivered carefully two travelers to Mars was Adler's design. Once the topic comes to problem-solving, it is acted the way Varol does by most of us - we are determined to answer without wholly considering the question. And as soon as we are sensationally attached to a special solution, it will be persistently defended by us. We never think about whether there will be a more suitable way. However, provided that we switch the question we suggest as Adler does, we can often find an answer as radical. Well, what should you do to ask more helpful questions? Initially, find out to distinguish between a plan and a tactic. What is the plan you practice to accomplish a specific result is a strategy, such as a traveler landing on Mars. On the other side of the coin, tactics are activities that perform this strategy. One of the tactics is to apply a three-legged falling system. Another one is surrounding your traveler with airbags. Confusing tactics with strategies are simple. Varol experienced this. Provided that you're having trouble determining your plan, relish a step back and question yourself what issue you are seeking to solve. Are you examining to rectify a broken landing system or search the Red Planet? By concentrating on the bigger image, it will be identified by you as the question to ask. After that, you can begin creating opinions or tactics as possible solutions to this problem. Furthermore, only in the end, your opinions are evaluated for quality by you. Chapter 6 - To reach the fact, it must be actively crossed your dead-legs by you. Provided that travelers of NASA's Mars Climate Orbiter asked the question of What don't we see?" in 1999, they may have bypassed a $193 million error. Two periods before the orbit's planned arrival date, data predicted that it would orbit Mars 100 kilometers below what it should have been. This defined a complete error. What would either burn sharply or jump out of Mars' atmosphere deep into space is the orbiting vehicle. However, travelers reduce the data inconsistency to a mistake in the navigation system. They were mistaken. On the date of arrival, although the orbiter overpassed behind Mars as prepared, was never heard of again. Following, a study discovered that the failure happened because a British company designed the system by using inch-pound measurements. The Metric system was used by travelers. The whole measurements were four times inaccurate. If they questioned the data rather than neglecting it, they might have stopped costly accidents. In the face of difficult data, it is looked by our minds for knowledge that confirms our views and neglects everything that is not. This is named consent prejudice and none of us are resistant to it. In case, it is so sad to hear opinions that oppose ours that we will escape it at all costs, even if the risks are immense. Therefore, how do you overwhelm your established aim to see just what you desire to perceive? Firstly, escape shifting overly joined to your thoughts. Rather, consider every view as a practical hypothesis. This turns your faith into a theory that can be verified, not verified, or even left. In that way, you stay objective. Better still, create a series of different hypotheses so you don't stick to a single result. Putting contradictory hypotheses is a magnificent path to reducing your dead-legs. Formulate these hypotheses by questioning what is abstaining. Provided that the navigators had done this, they might have posed the problem in parts of the measure. He could save the duty. Lastly, try to refute your hypothesis instead of proving them. Make this by presenting your ideas to yourself as if they referred to someone else. Discover each hole in each discussion and cut it into parts. Don't forget, every hypothesis you debunk takes you one footstep closer to the fact. Chapter 7 - Selectively testing it to be a sure achievement is the most appropriate way. There is training that takes long years before they travel to space for astronauts. It is spent hours training procedures in the Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory by them, an immense pool that houses a sunken copy of the International Space Station. It is even experienced, by them, weightlessness in an airplane that mimics zero-gravity by diving like a rollercoaster and called a "vomit comet." However, what has replicated emergencies that take astronauts to their physical boundaries is the most arduous education exercises. In space, a single incorrect move could make such a circumstance deadly. Therefore, the education program seeks to cheat them into making an error. In that way, the astronaut gets better ready for their duties. Typically, it is used by us as tests to validate our faiths, not challenge them. Provided that we get bad outcomes, we discover a reason to support them, such as adverse circumstances or bad climate. Rather, it must be asked by us how well we created this test. As the main goal of a test is to discover the division dot where things go opposite. It is not trained by most of us in the circumstances in which we will be examined, therefore, we may not be able to recognize this division dot till it's too late. Although our big talk is not in a cave area under dazzling lights, in the comfort of our home. When we wear sweatpants rather than a tough suit, we ask a good-natured friend to have a fake job interview with us. This gets us more fit to disappoint on the big day. As long as you are not going into space, it can be safely exercised in an atmosphere that mimics the test you are approached by you. It is done with the help of trying his jokes at small comedy clubs by Jerry Seinfeld who is a comedian. It can change the material according to the attendee's answers or even cut it. In that path, he'll get better ready for significant shows. During testing, it is significant to make sure that every element is tested separately. Ultimately, the entire system is checked as well. Don't make the error of believing that something will run just because every part works well on its own. After all, a drug that is useful alone can be deadly when blended with different medications. Test as completely as probable and urge yourself or your goods to the boundaries. Thanks to that, you will gain confidence in your talent to control anything that gets your path. Chapter 8 - So much as in the middle of achievement, our failures must be cautiously examined by us. Once you target higher, failure is inescapable. Provided that you are looking for an elementary solution, you will be producing a lot of opinions. Most of these ideas will not agree with the summary. However, they perform a significant role in bringing you to get closer to this groundbreaking idea. 5,126 unsuccessful models were produced over 15 years by James Dyson. Just then did he discover the correct design for his popular bag vacuum cleaner. Once we mindfully examine our unsuccess, as Dyson did, they ensure us with strong perspicacity. However, it is not adequate to examine past unsuccess. We should also be worried about our achievements. What can be followed back to earlier achievements is many tragedies. This was the situation during the disastrous Challenger space duty in 1986. It has been frequently expressed his worry about the space shuttle's O-rings by Roger Boisjoly who was a mechanical engineer. What blocks heated gases from escaping through bonds in rocket propellants are these slim rubber straps. However, the damaged O-rings in early duties were still handled to work. For this reason, Boisjoly's worries were ignored as a tolerable risk. On January 28, 1986, Challenger was started triumphantly. However, a minute before its flight, the space shuttle crumbled and destroyed seven astronauts. It was discovered by a specific commission that the reason for this was the O-rings. As flying with degraded O-rings converted standard practice, NASA saw this as the standard rather than a grave idea.